Offer v. McMillan

California Court of Appeal

Offer v. McMillan

226 P.2d 380, 101 Cal. App. 2d 840, 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1102

California Court of Appeal·Decided January 23, 1951·No. Civ. No. 7920·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

DEIRUP, J. pro tem.

The plaintiffs have appealed [841] error. There is no basis for a discussion of this point, for we cannot take the opinion into account. “The findings and conclusions constitute the final decision of the court and an oral or written opinion cannot be resorted to for the purpose of impeaching or gainsaying the findings and judgment.” (Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co., 71 Cal.App.2d 777, 781 [163 P.2d 756].)

The judgment is affirmed. Appeal from order denying new trial dismissed.

Adams, P. J., and Peek, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DEIRUP, J. pro tem.

The plaintiffs have appealed [841] error. There is no basis for a discussion of this point, for we cannot take the opinion into account. “The findings and conclusions constitute the final decision of the court and an oral or written opinion cannot be resorted to for the purpose of impeaching or gainsaying the findings and judgment.” (Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co., 71 Cal.App.2d 777, 781 [163 P.2d 756].)

The judgment is affirmed. Appeal from order denying new trial dismissed.

Adams, P. J., and Peek, J., concurred.

Offer v. McMillan, 226 P.2d 380, 101 Cal. App. 2d 840, 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1102 (Cal. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

226 P.2d 380 (Offer v. McMillan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related