Offenberg v. Benson Chevrolet, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Offenberg v. Benson Chevrolet, Inc.

12 A.D.2d 770, 209 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13583

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 3, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 770 (Offenberg v. Benson Chevrolet, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Offenberg v. Benson Chevrolet, Inc., 12 A.D.2d 770, 209 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In action to recover damages for personal injuries, loss of services and medical expenses, arising out of defendant’s alleged negligence, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered March 18, 1969, after trial before a Special Referee. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, with costs to defendant to abide the event. In our opinion, the conclusion that the accident was caused by negligence on the part of defendant is contrary to the weight of the credible evidence. Nolan, P. J., Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur; Beldock and Pette, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In action to recover damages for personal injuries, loss of services and medical expenses, arising out of defendant’s alleged negligence, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered March 18, 1969, after trial before a Special Referee. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, with costs to defendant to abide the event. In our opinion, the conclusion that the accident was caused by negligence on the part of defendant is contrary to the weight of the credible evidence. Nolan, P. J., Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur; Beldock and Pette, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 770, 209 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/offenberg-v-benson-chevrolet-inc-nyappdiv-1961.