Ofelio Muniz, Jr. v. Jim Scheopner, Robert S. Archer, and Joe Vasquez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 20, 2002
Docket13-02-00195-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ofelio Muniz, Jr. v. Jim Scheopner, Robert S. Archer, and Joe Vasquez (Ofelio Muniz, Jr. v. Jim Scheopner, Robert S. Archer, and Joe Vasquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ofelio Muniz, Jr. v. Jim Scheopner, Robert S. Archer, and Joe Vasquez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

                                   NUMBER 13-02-195-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

OFELIO MUNIZ, JR.,                                                             Appellant,

                                                   v.

JIM SCHEOPNER, ROBERT S. ARCHER,

AND JOE VASQUEZ,                                                            Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

                        On appeal from the 197th District Court

                                 of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

                                   O P I N I O N

                   Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

                                       Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, OFELIO MUNIZ, JR., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the   197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2001-05-2390-C.  The clerk=s record was received on May 3, 2002.   Appellant has failed to tender the $125.00 filing fee.

On May 15, 2002, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant was advised that if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s notice, the appeal would be dismissed.  To date, appellant has failed to respond.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s  failure to tender the $125.00 filing fee, this Court=s notice, and appellant=s failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 20th day of June, 2002

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ofelio Muniz, Jr. v. Jim Scheopner, Robert S. Archer, and Joe Vasquez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ofelio-muniz-jr-v-jim-scheopner-robert-s-archer-an-texapp-2002.