O'Farrill v. Rothenberg
635 So. 2d 1075, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4127, 1994 WL 162725
Opinions
The motion for disqualification filed below by the petitioner, Ramon O’Farrill, was legally sufficient. The facts alleged in the motion would place a reasonably prudent person in fear of not receiving a fair and impartial trial. MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc., 565 So.2d 1332 (Fla.1990); Hayslip v. Douglas, 400 So.2d 553 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Accordingly, the writ of prohibition is granted and the respondent is prohibited from presiding over this cause.
GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Farrill v. Rothenberg, 635 So. 2d 1075, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4127, 1994 WL 162725 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
635 So. 2d 1075 (O'Farrill v. Rothenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hayslip v. Douglas
400 So. 2d 553 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Cleveland v. State
417 So. 2d 653 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc.
565 So. 2d 1332 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
State v. Cleveland
390 So. 2d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)