Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/O'Farrill v. Rothenberg

O'Farrill v. Rothenberg

635 So. 2d 1075, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4127, 1994 WL 162725
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 3, 1994
DocketNo. 93-2582
StatusPublished

This text of 635 So. 2d 1075 (O'Farrill v. Rothenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Farrill v. Rothenberg, 635 So. 2d 1075, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4127, 1994 WL 162725 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The motion for disqualification filed below by the petitioner, Ramon O’Farrill, was legally sufficient. The facts alleged in the motion would place a reasonably prudent person in fear of not receiving a fair and impartial trial. MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc., 565 So.2d 1332 (Fla.1990); Hayslip v. Douglas, 400 So.2d 553 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Accordingly, the writ of prohibition is granted and the respondent is prohibited from presiding over this cause.

GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hayslip v. Douglas
400 So. 2d 553 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Cleveland v. State
417 So. 2d 653 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc.
565 So. 2d 1332 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
State v. Cleveland
390 So. 2d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
635 So. 2d 1075, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4127, 1994 WL 162725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ofarrill-v-rothenberg-fladistctapp-1994.