Of the Steamer Virginia v. West

Supreme Court

Of the Steamer Virginia v. West

60 U.S. 182, 15 L. Ed. 594, 19 How. 182, 1856 U.S. LEXIS 434

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 27, 1857

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 60 U.S. 182 (Of the Steamer Virginia v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Of the Steamer Virginia v. West, 60 U.S. 182, 15 L. Ed. 594, 19 How. 182, 1856 U.S. LEXIS 434 (1857).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice TANEY.

delivered the opinion of the. court.

This is an appeal from the Circuit Court for the district of Maryland.'

The. decree from which, the appeal has been taken was passed by the Circuit Court on the 17th day of November, 1855, and the appeal was prayed on the same day in open court. But ,it was not prosecuted to the next succeeding term of this court, *183 and no transcript of the record was filed here during that term. But a transcript has been filed at the present term of .this court, and the ease dockéted. And a motion is made to dismiss it, upon the ground that the appeal is not legally, before this court, according to the act of Congress regulating appeals.

The construction of this act of Congress, and the practice of this court under it, has been settled by the cases of Villalobos v. The United States, (6 Howard, 81,) and The United States v. Curry, (6 Howard, 106.) The transcript must he filed in this eourt-and the case docketed at the term next succeeding the appeal, in order to give this court jurisdiction. ' This case must therefore he dismissed.

But the dismissal does not bar.the appellant from taking and prosecuting another appeal at any time within five years from the date of the decree, provided the transcript is filed here and the ease docketed at the term next succeéding the date of such second appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice TANEY.

delivered the opinion of the. court.

This is an appeal from the Circuit Court for the district of Maryland.'

The. decree from which, the appeal has been taken was passed by the Circuit Court on the 17th day of November, 1855, and the appeal was prayed on the same day in open court. But ,it was not prosecuted to the next succeeding term of this court, *183 and no transcript of the record was filed here during that term. But a transcript has been filed at the present term of .this court, and the ease dockéted. And a motion is made to dismiss it, upon the ground that the appeal is not legally, before this court, according to the act of Congress regulating appeals.

The construction of this act of Congress, and the practice of this court under it, has been settled by the cases of Villalobos v. The United States, (6 Howard, 81,) and The United States v. Curry, (6 Howard, 106.) The transcript must he filed in this eourt-and the case docketed at the term next succeeding the appeal, in order to give this court jurisdiction. ' This case must therefore he dismissed.

But the dismissal does not bar.the appellant from taking and prosecuting another appeal at any time within five years from the date of the decree, provided the transcript is filed here and the ease docketed at the term next succeéding the date of such second appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 U.S. 182, 15 L. Ed. 594, 19 How. 182, 1856 U.S. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/of-the-steamer-virginia-v-west-scotus-1857.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack