of Castell v. Fleming

Supreme Court of South Carolina

of Castell v. Fleming

3 S.C.L. 463

DecidedNovember 15, 1804

StatusPublished

This text of 3 S.C.L. 463 (of Castell v. Fleming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

of Castell v. Fleming, 3 S.C.L. 463 (S.C. 1804).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

( U1 the judges present, except Lee, J.)

The’ ru|e ()† court been too rigidly expounded. It was not intended to dimisg tiom the den ket, at all events, causes which shall be standing on it tor four terms. Good reasons may be shewn, why a cause should be contiued for a rriuch longer time. If the parties consent, there can he reason why the cause should not be con; tinned. The rule a as made for the benefit and convenience of the parties, rattier than of the court.

Motion allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

( U1 the judges present, except Lee, J.)

The’ ru|e ()† court been too rigidly expounded. It was not intended to dimisg tiom the den ket, at all events, causes which shall be standing on it tor four terms. Good reasons may be shewn, why a cause should be contiued for a rriuch longer time. If the parties consent, there can he reason why the cause should not be con; tinned. The rule a as made for the benefit and convenience of the parties, rattier than of the court.

Motion allowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 S.C.L. 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/of-castell-v-fleming-sc-1804.