of Castell v. Fleming

Supreme Court of South Carolina

of Castell v. Fleming

3 S.C.L. 463

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided November 15, 1804·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

( U1 the judges present, except Lee, J.)

The’ ru|e ()† court been too rigidly expounded. It was not intended to dimisg tiom the den ket, at all events, causes which shall be standing on it tor four terms. Good reasons may be shewn, why a cause should be contiued for a rriuch longer time. If the parties consent, there can he reason why the cause should not be con; tinned. The rule a as made for the benefit and convenience of the parties, rattier than of the court.

Motion allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

( U1 the judges present, except Lee, J.)

The’ ru|e ()† court been too rigidly expounded. It was not intended to dimisg tiom the den ket, at all events, causes which shall be standing on it tor four terms. Good reasons may be shewn, why a cause should be contiued for a rriuch longer time. If the parties consent, there can he reason why the cause should not be con; tinned. The rule a as made for the benefit and convenience of the parties, rattier than of the court.

Motion allowed.

of Castell v. Fleming, 3 S.C.L. 463 (S.C. 1804).

Pincite

3 S.C.L. 463 (of Castell v. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.