of: Board of Commissioners of Cheltenham Twp

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

of: Board of Commissioners of Cheltenham Twp

179 A.3d 1079

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 29, 2018·No. 526 MAL 2017 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29 ^th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Commonwealth Court overlook the express language of 53 P.S. 10917 by holding that a zoning application for special exception is governed by an ordinance other than the ordinance in effect when the zoning application was filed?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29 ^th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Commonwealth Court overlook the express language of 53 P.S. 10917 by holding that a zoning application for special exception is governed by an ordinance other than the ordinance in effect when the zoning application was filed?

of: Board of Commissioners of Cheltenham Twp, 179 A.3d 1079 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

179 A.3d 1079 (of: Board of Commissioners of Cheltenham Twp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related