Oettl v. Brecher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oettl v. Brecher

12 A.D.2d 960, 214 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12766

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 960 (Oettl v. Brecher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oettl v. Brecher, 12 A.D.2d 960, 214 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12766 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of plaintiff’s fall into an excavation made for a large multiple dwelling project, in which action the defendants (respondents), who are the general contractors, and two- subcontractors asserted cross complaints against each other, the plaintiff appeals: (1) from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 17, 1958, upon the jury’s verdict after trial, as is in favor of the defendants Brecher and Wohl, the general contractors, against plaintiff, and in favor of the defendant Tully & Di Napoli, Inc., one of the subcontractors, against plaintiff; and (2) from so much of said judgment as dismisses the complaint against defendant H. & M. Concrete Construction Corp., the other subcontractor, after inquest against such subcontractor. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of plaintiff’s fall into an excavation made for a large multiple dwelling project, in which action the defendants (respondents), who are the general contractors, and two- subcontractors asserted cross complaints against each other, the plaintiff appeals: (1) from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 17, 1958, upon the jury’s verdict after trial, as is in favor of the defendants Brecher and Wohl, the general contractors, against plaintiff, and in favor of the defendant Tully & Di Napoli, Inc., one of the subcontractors, against plaintiff; and (2) from so much of said judgment as dismisses the complaint against defendant H. & M. Concrete Construction Corp., the other subcontractor, after inquest against such subcontractor. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 960, 214 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oettl-v-brecher-nyappdiv-1961.