Oetting v. Lewis, Rice, & Fingersh, L.C.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Oetting v. Lewis, Rice, & Fingersh, L.C.

220 S.W.3d 369, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 386, 2007 WL 656302

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 6, 2007

DocketED 88806

StatusPublished

This text of 220 S.W.3d 369 (Oetting v. Lewis, Rice, & Fingersh, L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oetting v. Lewis, Rice, & Fingersh, L.C., 220 S.W.3d 369, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 386, 2007 WL 656302 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Oetting (“Oetting”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of Lewis Rice & Fingersh L.C. (“Lewis Rice”) on Oet-ting’s claims for legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract. Oetting also appeals the denial of his motion for partial summary judgment against Lewis Rice on the issue of liability.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI