Oetting v. Lewis, Rice, & Fingersh, L.C.

220 S.W.3d 369, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 386, 2007 WL 656302
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 6, 2007·No. ED 88806·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Oetting (“Oetting”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of Lewis Rice & Fingersh L.C. (“Lewis Rice”) on Oet-ting’s claims for legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract. Oetting also appeals the denial of his motion for partial summary judgment against Lewis Rice on the issue of liability.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oetting v. Lewis, Rice, & Fingersh, L.C., 220 S.W.3d 369, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 386, 2007 WL 656302 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

220 S.W.3d 369 (Oetting v. Lewis, Rice, & Fingersh, L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jost Associates, L.P. v. St. Louis County
220 S.W.3d 369 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)