Oetken v. Shell
This text of 217 P.2d 906 (Oetken v. Shell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
For what appeared to be good and sufficient cause a rehearing was granted in this case with a request to counsel for the respective parties that they rebrief and orally argue questions raised with respect to the statute of frauds and trusts in lands arising by implication of law. The pertinent facts and issues involved are fully stated in the initial opinion (Oetken v. Shell, 168 Kan. 244, 212 P. 2d 329) and for that reason need not be repeated in this opinion.
The case was rebriefed and has been reargued by counsel as requested.
Upon examination of the additional briefs and careful consideration of all questions orally presented and argued the court has concluded its original opinion should be adhered to.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 P.2d 906, 169 Kan. 109, 1950 Kan. LEXIS 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oetken-v-shell-kan-1950.