Oetjen v. Fajen

City of New York Municipal Court

Oetjen v. Fajen

6 Misc. 605, 25 N.Y.S. 1151

City of New York Municipal Court·Decided November 15, 1893·Published

Opinion

McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a. motion to vacate and set aside a judgment entered herein and to vacate and set aside an attachment issued in the same action. The facts are conflicting and appear to have been fairly and fully considered by the justice who passed on the motion. It involves a question of fact, and we do not feel that we can determine more correctly than he.

Order is affirmed, with costs.

Newburger, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a. motion to vacate and set aside a judgment entered herein and to vacate and set aside an attachment issued in the same action. The facts are conflicting and appear to have been fairly and fully considered by the justice who passed on the motion. It involves a question of fact, and we do not feel that we can determine more correctly than he.

Order is affirmed, with costs.

Newburger, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Oetjen v. Fajen, 6 Misc. 605, 25 N.Y.S. 1151 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

6 Misc. 605 (Oetjen v. Fajen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.