Oethout v. Kerr
84 N.Y.S. 1137
This text of 84 N.Y.S. 1137 (Oethout v. Kerr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oethout v. Kerr, 84 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1903).
Opinion
The defendant made a motion to vacate an order for substituted service, which was denied. Defendant appeals. The affidavits sufficiently show that defendant was a resident of the state and was avoiding service. We find no abuse of discretion on the part [1138]*1138of the justice. See Code, § 435; Collins v. Ryan, 32 Barb. 647; Haswell v. Lincks, 87 N. Y. 637. Order is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Haswell v. . Lincks
87 N.Y. 637 (New York Court of Appeals, 1882)
Collins v. Ryan
32 Barb. 647 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
84 N.Y.S. 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oethout-v-kerr-nysupct-1903.