Oethout v. Kerr
84 N.Y.S. 1137
Opinion
The defendant made a motion to vacate an order for substituted service, which was denied. Defendant appeals. The affidavits sufficiently show that defendant was a resident of the state and was avoiding service. We find no abuse of discretion on the part [1138]*1138of the justice. See Code, § 435; Collins v. Ryan, 32 Barb. 647; Haswell v. Lincks, 87 N. Y. 637. Order is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oethout v. Kerr, 84 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1903).
84 N.Y.S. 1137 (Oethout v. Kerr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haswell v. . Lincks
87 N.Y. 637 (New York Court of Appeals, 1882)
Collins v. Ryan
32 Barb. 647 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)