Oeschger v. City of Boston
294 N.E.2d 598, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 800
This text of 294 N.E.2d 598 (Oeschger v. City of Boston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oeschger v. City of Boston, 294 N.E.2d 598, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 800 (Mass. Ct. App. 1973).
Opinion
The appeal was not claimed within twenty days of the entry of the orders sustaining the several demurrers. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 96. Randall v. Kemler, 321 Mass. 753, and cases cited. The judge who acted on the demurrers had no power to extend the statutory period. Commonwealth v. Rodriquez, 333 Mass. 501, and cases cited.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Rodriquez
131 N.E.2d 774 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1956)
Randall v. Kemler
76 N.E.2d 313 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1947)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
294 N.E.2d 598, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oeschger-v-city-of-boston-massappct-1973.