Oelkers v. Hulseberg
279 A.D. 669, 108 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3414
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1951·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [200 Mise. 352.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oelkers v. Hulseberg, 279 A.D. 669, 108 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3414 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
279 A.D. 669 (Oelkers v. Hulseberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Doyle v. Berley
215 A.D.2d 349 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Mandelbaum v. Mandelbaum
151 A.D.2d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Katz v. Siroty
62 A.D.2d 1011 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Zappala v. Dyer
25 A.D.2d 687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Fromkin v. Loehmann's Hewlett, Inc.
16 Misc. 2d 117 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Hammerman v. Louis Watch Co.
7 A.D.2d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)