Oelker v. Olds

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided March 15, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-01490·Unknown

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 JEROMY OELKER, Case No.: 2:23-cv-01490-APG-DJA

4 Plaintiff Order Denying Motion to Vacate Judgment 5 v. [ECF No. 32] 6 MAGISTRATE VICTORIA OLDS, et al.,

7 Defendants

8 Plaintiff Jeromy Oelker filed a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) 9 asking this court to vacate a judgment entered against him in Idaho state court. ECF No. 32. 10 Oelker’s motion is procedurally barred. There is no complaint pending upon which to grant 11 relief. Magistrate Judge Albregts dismissed Oelker’s amended complaint and permitted Oelker 12 to file a second amended complaint by February 20, 2024. ECF No. 31 at 5. Oelker has not done 13 so. Further, no defendant has been served with process or joined to the case. Thus, Oelker’s 14 motion to vacate is premature. 15 In addition, this court has no authority to grant the relief Oelker requests. The Rooker– 16 Feldman doctrine bars federal district courts from hearing “cases brought by state-court losers 17 complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered before the district court 18 proceedings commenced and inviting district court review and rejection of those judgments.” 19 Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp., 544 U.S. 280, 284 (2005). Thus, Oelker’s 20 motion lacks merit. 21 Magistrate Judge Albregts warned Oelker that failure to file a second amended complaint 22 by February 20, 2024 would result in the recommendation of dismissal of this case. ECF No. 31 23 at 5. Magistrate Judge Albregts has twice pointed out fatal defects in Oelker’s claims. ECF Nos. 31. Yet Oelker has not been able to file a proper complaint. It is apparent that the claims he 2|| hopes to pursue are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations and the Rooker-Feldman 3} doctrine. Further leave to amend would be futile. 4 I THEREFORE ORDER that plaintiff Jeromy Oelker’s motion to vacate (ECF No. 32) is 5] DENIED. 6 I FURTHER ORDER the clerk of the court to close this case. 7 DATED this 15th day of March, 2024. 8 EEK. 9 ANDREW P.GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oelker v. Olds, (D. Nev. 2024).

Oelker v. Olds (Oelker v. Olds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.
544 U.S. 280 (Supreme Court, 2005)