Oelberman v. Rosenbaum

4 N.Y.S. 210, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1098
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 26, 1888·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lawrence, J.

Unless the defendant can show that the decision of the general term of this department, in Sutphen v. Lash, 10 Hun, 120, has been modified or reversed, I must hold that the defendant is not entitled to a trial fee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oelberman v. Rosenbaum, 4 N.Y.S. 210, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1098 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

4 N.Y.S. 210 (Oelberman v. Rosenbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lockwood v. Salmon River Paper Co.
20 N.Y.S. 967 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)