Oeding v. Schweinler

143 A. 918, 103 N.J. Eq. 370, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 668
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 15, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 143 A. 918 (Oeding v. Schweinler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oeding v. Schweinler, 143 A. 918, 103 N.J. Eq. 370, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 668 (N.J. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 455.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Reich
34 A.2d 143 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 A. 918, 103 N.J. Eq. 370, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oeding-v-schweinler-nj-1928.