Oeding v. Schweinler
143 A. 918, 103 N.J. Eq. 370, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 668
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 455.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oeding v. Schweinler, 143 A. 918, 103 N.J. Eq. 370, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 668 (N.J. 1928).
143 A. 918 (Oeding v. Schweinler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Reich
34 A.2d 143 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)