O'Donnell v. Wacker
This text of 485 P.3d 311 (O'Donnell v. Wacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Submitted March 5, affirmed April 14, 2021
Kerry Ann O’DONNELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jason Lee WACKER, Respondent-Respondent. Multnomah County Circuit Court 130665951; A173380 485 P3d 311
Xiomara Y. Torres, Judge. Kerry O’Donnell filed the brief pro se. No appearance for respondent. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Cite as 310 Or App 698 (2021) 699
PER CURIAM In this domestic relations matter, wife appeals a supplemental judgment modifying a domestic relations judgment, challenging determinations related to custody and parenting time. But wife has not supplied us with tran- scripts of the relevant oral proceedings, making it impossi- ble to perform our review function. As it was wife’s respon- sibility to supply an adequate record, we affirm for that reason. See State v. Y. B., 296 Or App 781, 785, 439 P3d 1036 (2019) (discussion of an appellant’s burden to supply court with adequate record on which to perform review function). Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
485 P.3d 311, 310 Or. App. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odonnell-v-wacker-orctapp-2021.