O'Donnell v. Town of Westfield

Supreme Court of New Jersey

O'Donnell v. Town of Westfield

176 A. 110, 117 N.J. Eq. 422, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 653

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 10, 1935·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We conclude that the bill shows sufficient equity to justify its retention; and that is the only question before us at this time.

*423 Certain ad interim restraint was awarded, but the order of the court of chancery in that regard is not before us, and we express no opinion on it.

The order under review is affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodike, Dokges, Heher, Perskie, Vak Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We conclude that the bill shows sufficient equity to justify its retention; and that is the only question before us at this time.

*423 Certain ad interim restraint was awarded, but the order of the court of chancery in that regard is not before us, and we express no opinion on it.

The order under review is affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodike, Dokges, Heher, Perskie, Vak Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

O'Donnell v. Town of Westfield, 176 A. 110, 117 N.J. Eq. 422, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 653 (N.J. 1935).

Pincite

176 A. 110 (O'Donnell v. Town of Westfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.