O'Donnell v. State
117 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 685
This text of 117 So. 926 (O'Donnell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O'Donnell v. State, 117 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 685 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still. There is sufficient evidence to support the verdict, and there is no prejudicial error in any rulings of the trial court on the evidence. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
117 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odonnell-v-state-alactapp-1928.