O'Donnell v. State
117 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 685
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still. There is sufficient evidence to support the verdict, and there is no prejudicial error in any rulings of the trial court on the evidence. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Donnell v. State, 117 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 685 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).
117 So. 926 (O'Donnell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.