O'Donnell v. Quinn

100 Ill. App. 5, 1901 Ill. App. LEXIS 484
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJanuary 24, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 100 Ill. App. 5 (O'Donnell v. Quinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Donnell v. Quinn, 100 Ill. App. 5, 1901 Ill. App. LEXIS 484 (Ill. Ct. App. 1902).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

The so-called “ record ” filed in this case contains a certified copy of a bill of exceptions and an appeal bond. Upon this appellants have assigned errors. There is no record here showing the proceedings and judgment of the court below. It is true the bill of exceptions states what judgment the court entered at the close of the proofs. The bill of exceptions is but the pleading of the party filing it, signed and sealed by the trial judge, as the means of establishing its truth. This paper filed in the cause does not take the place of the record the law requires the clerk to keep upon record books, showing the various steps taken in the cause and the final judgment. If the attorney procures the judge to state in the bill of exceptions what the judgment was, that recital is not a judgment, it is not written by the clerk or spread of record, it does not give a lien upon real estate and no execution could issue upon it. The clerk has certified this bill of exceptions is a correct and true transcript, of all proceedings in this cause; If so, there is no judgment in this case in the court below, and nothing from which to appeal. If there is such a judgment section 72 of the practice act and rule 9 of this court require that a transcript thereof be filed here. We can not even dismiss this appeal; for a transcript of the final judgment, prayer and order of appeal, appeal bond and its approval, is necessary to give us jurisdiction for that purpose. Ho jurisdiction of a cause is conferred upon this court by filing merely a transcript of a bill of exceptions and an appeal bond, and assigning errors thereon. The order taking the cause for decision will be vacated, and cause stricken from the docket.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fisher v. Hargrave
48 N.E.2d 966 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1943)
Watson v. Sullivan
260 Ill. App. 259 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1931)
People v. Brewerton Coal Co.
253 Ill. App. 414 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1929)
Posey v. Graham
174 Ill. App. 304 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1912)
People v. Rubright
160 Ill. App. 528 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1911)
Ashmore v. Skene Lead Co.
150 Ill. App. 381 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1909)
Riva v. City of Spring Talley
129 Ill. App. 167 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 Ill. App. 5, 1901 Ill. App. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odonnell-v-quinn-illappct-1902.