O'Donnell v. New York State & Local Retirement Systems

249 A.D.2d 607, 670 N.Y.S.2d 631, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3574
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 2, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 249 A.D.2d 607 (O'Donnell v. New York State & Local Retirement Systems) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Donnell v. New York State & Local Retirement Systems, 249 A.D.2d 607, 670 N.Y.S.2d 631, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3574 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a retired Lieutenant in the City of Buffalo Fire Department, filed for accidental disability retirement benefits in June 1994. Petitioner alleged that he had sustained a permanent disability to his shoulder as the result of two on-the-job accidents. The first injury occurred on November 9, 1986, during a fire at which petitioner fell or tripped into a hole on a torn-up sidewalk. The second injury occurred on December 26, 1990, when petitioner slipped on ice at the scene of a fire while he was assisting other firefighters in returning a hose to the company’s pumper. Following a hearing, the application was disapproved upon a finding that neither incident constituted an “accident” within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 363. Substantial evidence supports the conclusion that petitioner’s injuries were the result of an ordinary misstep and a risk inherent in the duties of a firefighter and did not constitute an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law (see, Matter of Seim v Regan, 191 AD2d 931). Consequently, the determination denying petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits will not be disturbed (see, Matter of Finnegan v Regan, 116 AD2d 878, 879).

[608]*608Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kelly v. DiNapoli
94 N.E.3d 444 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 2018)
Purcell v. DiNapoli
81 A.D.3d 1069 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Franks v. New York State & Local Retirement System
47 A.D.3d 1115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Lassen v. Hevesi
9 A.D.3d 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
County of Montgomery v. Hevesi
1 Misc. 3d 522 (New York Supreme Court, 2003)
Slagle v. McCall
293 A.D.2d 923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Penkalski v. McCall
292 A.D.2d 735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Dzwielewski v. McCall
277 A.D.2d 622 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Zajdowicz v. New York State & Local Police & Fire Retirement System
267 A.D.2d 863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.D.2d 607, 670 N.Y.S.2d 631, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odonnell-v-new-york-state-local-retirement-systems-nyappdiv-1998.