O'Donnell v. Marine Transit Corp.
This text of 240 A.D. 840 (O'Donnell v. Marine Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment on appeal of defendant Globe and Rutgers Fire Insurance Company affirmed, without costs. Judgment in so far as appealed from by plaintiffs affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents upon the ground that the plaintiffs’ recovery was limited by clause 17 of the rider with reference to coinsurance. [146 Misc. 502.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odonnell-v-marine-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1933.