O'Donnell v. Heimann
This text of 133 N.W. 208 (O'Donnell v. Heimann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action in ejectment to recover possession of an undivided one-fourth of the same tract of land which was in controversy in Kulp v. Heimann, ante, p. 167. The pleadings were similar to those in that case, with the exception of a plea of the statute of limitations, which was there interposed.- The evidence in both cases was practically the same. Defendants had the judgment, and the plaintiff has appealed.
Following, the decision in that case, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 N.W. 208, 90 Neb. 172, 1911 Neb. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odonnell-v-heimann-neb-1911.