O'Donnell v. Gillespie
261 F. 48, 171 C.C.A. 644, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1712
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 22, 1919·No. No. 5347·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
This is another of the similar cases tried with Washburn v. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 41, - C. C. A. -, decided at this term. The contentions are embraced in those determined in the case of Washburn and the case of Wright v. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 46,-C. C. A.-, also decided at this term. The additional claim that the lease was to have been like the Wright lease and was to be nonassignable was determined adversely by the trial court, with whose conclusion we agree.
The decree should be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Donnell v. Gillespie, 261 F. 48, 171 C.C.A. 644, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1712 (8th Cir. 1919).
261 F. 48 (O'Donnell v. Gillespie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sutherland v. Gillespie
261 F. 49 (Eighth Circuit, 1919)