O'Donnell v. Curran

Appellate Court of Illinois

O'Donnell v. Curran

210 Ill. App. 200, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 193

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 3, 1918

DocketGen. No. 21,779

StatusPublished

This text of 210 Ill. App. 200 (O'Donnell v. Curran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Donnell v. Curran, 210 Ill. App. 200, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 193 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and eerob, § 801*—what must he preserved in hill of exceptions. The ruling of a trial court striking an amended affidavit of merits from the files cannot be reviewed unless the pleading and the ruling are preserved in a hill of exceptions. 3. Municipal Court oe Chicago, § 13*—non-necessity of formal written pleadings in action of fourth class. No formal written pleadings are required in an action of the fourth class in the Municipal Court of Chicago. 4. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 13*—when statement of claim is sufficient in action of fourth class. A statement of claim, in an action of the fourth class in the Municipal Court of Chicago, though technically defective, which advises the defendant of the plaintiff’s demand, as required by the Municipal Court Act, sec. 40 (J. & A. If- 3352), is sufficient when questioned for the first time in a court of review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and eerob, § 801*—what must he preserved in hill of exceptions. The ruling of a trial court striking an amended affidavit of merits from the files cannot be reviewed unless the pleading and the ruling are preserved in a hill of exceptions. 3. Municipal Court oe Chicago, § 13*—non-necessity of formal written pleadings in action of fourth class. No formal written pleadings are required in an action of the fourth class in the Municipal Court of Chicago. 4. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 13*—when statement of claim is sufficient in action of fourth class. A statement of claim, in an action of the fourth class in the Municipal Court of Chicago, though technically defective, which advises the defendant of the plaintiff’s demand, as required by the Municipal Court Act, sec. 40 (J. & A. If- 3352), is sufficient when questioned for the first time in a court of review.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 Ill. App. 200, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odonnell-v-curran-illappct-1918.