Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/O'Donnell v. City of New York

O'Donnell v. City of New York

289 A.D.2d 248, 734 N.Y.S.2d 477, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11756
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 3, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 289 A.D.2d 248 (O'Donnell v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Donnell v. City of New York, 289 A.D.2d 248, 734 N.Y.S.2d 477, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve late notices of claim, the City of New York appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.), dated May 26, 2000, which granted the application.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the application is denied.

The petitioners’ application for permission to file late notices of claim is time-barred (see, Patterson v City of New York, 289 AD2d 213 [decided herewith]; Matter of Huggler v City of New York, 289 AD2d 240 [decided herewith]). O’Brien, J. P., Florio, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patterson v. City of New York
289 A.D.2d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Huggler v. City of New York
289 A.D.2d 240 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 A.D.2d 248, 734 N.Y.S.2d 477, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odonnell-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2001.