O'DONNELL v. Bachelor
This text of 229 A.2d 755 (O'DONNELL v. Bachelor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This is an appeal from the Order of the lower Court which, after a jury verdict for defendant, dismissed plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. Unfortunately, the appellant failed to have judgment entered on the verdict before this appeal was taken. We have repeatedly held that, in the absence of such judgment, no appeal lies: Lynch v. Metropolitan L. Ins. Co., 422 Pa. 488, 222 A. 2d 925. In Lynch, the Court said *627 (page 489): “No judgment on .the verdict has ever been entered. In the absence of such judgment no appeal lies. In Menyo v. Sphar, 409 Pa. 223, 224 (footnote), 186 A. 2d 9, we recently said: ‘Too many members of the Bar mistakenly believe that the appeal is from an Order which dismissed their motion for a new trial, instead of from a judgment which was entered on the verdict: [citing authorities].’ See also: Denmon v. Rhodes, 416 Pa. 568, 569, 207 A. 2d 860; Gelzhiser v. Fisher, 418 Pa. 88, 208 A. 2d 836. [Emphasis in original]
“The instant appeal, being premature, must be quashed.”
Appeal quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 A.2d 755, 425 Pa. 626, 1967 Pa. LEXIS 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odonnell-v-bachelor-pa-1967.