O'Donnell v. Astrue

Fourth Circuit

O'Donnell v. Astrue

326 F. App'x 251

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 8, 2009

DocketNo. 08-1961

StatusPublished

This text of 326 F. App'x 251 (O'Donnell v. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Donnell v. Astrue, 326 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alan O’Donnell appeals the order of the magistrate judge granting summary judgment to the Commissioner in this action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. O’Donnell v. Astrue, No. 1:07-cv-00195-DLH (W.D.N.C. June 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alan O’Donnell appeals the order of the magistrate judge granting summary judgment to the Commissioner in this action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. O’Donnell v. Astrue, No. 1:07-cv-00195-DLH (W.D.N.C. June 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

326 F. App'x 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odonnell-v-astrue-ca4-2009.