O'Donnell v. Astrue

Fourth Circuit

O'Donnell v. Astrue

326 F. App'x 251

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 8, 2009·No. No. 08-1961·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alan O’Donnell appeals the order of the magistrate judge granting summary judgment to the Commissioner in this action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. O’Donnell v. Astrue, No. 1:07-cv-00195-DLH (W.D.N.C. June 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alan O’Donnell appeals the order of the magistrate judge granting summary judgment to the Commissioner in this action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. O’Donnell v. Astrue, No. 1:07-cv-00195-DLH (W.D.N.C. June 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

O'Donnell v. Astrue, 326 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

326 F. App'x 251 (O'Donnell v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.