O'Donnell (Thomas) v. State
This text of O'Donnell (Thomas) v. State (O'Donnell (Thomas) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
decision on December 17, 2014, and motion for conflict of interest, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). To the extent that appellant appeals from decisions resolving his motions to correct/vacate illegal sentence, and a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus, these appeals are premature as no decisions, oral or written, had been made on the motions and petition when appellant filed his appeal. Because appellant failed to designate an appealable order, we lack jurisdiction over these appeals, and we ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.
Agser J Parraguirre '
Douglas
cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge Thomas Edward O'Donnell Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
O'Donnell (Thomas) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odonnell-thomas-v-state-nev-2015.