O'Donel v. Great Lakes S. S. Co.

7 F.R.D. 501, 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1706
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio
DecidedOctober 29, 1946
DocketCivil Action No. 24080
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 F.R.D. 501 (O'Donel v. Great Lakes S. S. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Donel v. Great Lakes S. S. Co., 7 F.R.D. 501, 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1706 (N.D. Ohio 1946).

Opinion

JONES, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this case sues under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., for unpaid overtime compensation and damages.

The defendant has filed a motion attacking the complaint in several respects. This Court has heretofore held Section 11225 of the Ohio General Code applicable and that part of the motion will be sustained. See Remley v. Triangle Publications, D.C., 69 F.Supp. 808.

Subsequent to the filing of the defendant’s motion, the plaintiff has moved to amend her complaint by interlineation. In view of the liberality expressed in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 15, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, and the above ruling of the Court, leave is granted to file an amended complaint within twenty (20) days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sontcvh v. Sharon Steel Corp.
73 F. Supp. 825 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 F.R.D. 501, 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odonel-v-great-lakes-s-s-co-ohnd-1946.