Odom v. Wilson

Fourth Circuit

Odom v. Wilson

250 F. App'x 573

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 10, 2007·No. No. 07-6807·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Odom v. Wilson, No. 8:07-cv-00325-PMD, 2007 WL 1231797 (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Odom v. Wilson, No. 8:07-cv-00325-PMD, 2007 WL 1231797 (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Odom v. Wilson, 250 F. App'x 573 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

250 F. App'x 573 (Odom v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related