Odom v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Odom v. State

257 S.W.2d 114, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2301

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Odom v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 156 Tex. Crim. 42 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 22, 1953·No. No. 26386·Published

Opinion

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of chicken theft, and his punishment was assessed at 70 days confinement in jail.

The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of chicken theft, and his punishment was assessed at 70 days confinement in jail.

The indictment and all matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Odom v. State, 257 S.W.2d 114, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2301 (Tex. 1953).

Pincite

257 S.W.2d 114 (Odom v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.