Odom v. State

2018 ND 163, 913 N.W.2d 775
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 11, 2018
Docket20180089
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2018 ND 163 (Odom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Odom v. State, 2018 ND 163, 913 N.W.2d 775 (N.D. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Charles Bradford Odom appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Odom argues the district court erred in denying his application because the recently amended N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23(1)(a)(2) is a change in substantive law that should be applied retrospectively in the interest of justice. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7), see State v. Iverson , 2006 ND 193 , ¶ 8, 721 N.W.2d 396 (holding a statute lessening punishment may not be applied retroactively to final convictions because it would constitute an invalid exercise by the Legislature of the executive pardoning power).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garcia v. State
2019 ND 103 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 ND 163, 913 N.W.2d 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odom-v-state-nd-2018.