Odom v. State

2018 ND 163, 913 N.W.2d 775
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided July 11, 2018·No. 20180089·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Charles Bradford Odom appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Odom argues the district court erred in denying his application because the recently amended N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23(1)(a)(2) is a change in substantive law that should be applied retrospectively in the interest of justice. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7), see State v. Iverson , 2006 ND 193 , ¶ 8, 721 N.W.2d 396 (holding a statute lessening punishment may not be applied retroactively to final convictions because it would constitute an invalid exercise by the Legislature of the executive pardoning power).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Odom v. State, 2018 ND 163, 913 N.W.2d 775 (N.D. 2018).

2018 ND 163 (Odom v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garcia v. State
2019 ND 103 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)