Odom v. State

90 So. 3d 847, 2012 WL 1759379, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7992
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Odom v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8750
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 2012·No. No. 2D11-2075·Published

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

Dustin D. Odom challenges the thirty-six-month prison term imposed following a revocation of his community control for the original offense of possession of a controlled substance. The only issue raised by Odom’s counsel and answered by the State is related to the possession issue discussed in State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011). But Odom’s revocation [848]*848was based on a technical violation and does not involve any possession-related new law violations. Because the Adkins issue relates only to his underlying conviction and not to the revocation and sentence currently before this court, we affirm Odom’s revocation and resulting sentence without further comment.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Odom v. State, 90 So. 3d 847, 2012 WL 1759379, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7992 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

90 So. 3d 847 (Odom v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Adkins
71 So. 3d 184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)