Odom v. Ryan
This text of Odom v. Ryan (Odom v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1266
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STEPHEN RYAN; JUDGE ARTHUR MCFARLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-03271-PMD)
Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 29, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v.
Ryan, No. 3:09-cv-03271-PMD (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Odom v. Ryan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odom-v-ryan-ca4-2010.