Odom v. Rosado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Odom v. Rosado

30 A.D.2d 537, 291 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4084

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 537 (Odom v. Rosado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Odom v. Rosado, 30 A.D.2d 537, 291 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4084 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Separate appeals, as limited by appellants’ separate briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 10, 1967, as, on respondents’ motion, set aside the [538]*538jury verdict insofar as it was in their favor against appellants and granted a new trial to respondents as against appellants. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs, motion denied and said parts of the verdict reinstated. In our opinion the jury did not render inconsistent verdicts. On the basis of the record presented we find that the award of $100 to plaintiff Odom was not inadequate. Christ, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Separate appeals, as limited by appellants’ separate briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 10, 1967, as, on respondents’ motion, set aside the [538]*538jury verdict insofar as it was in their favor against appellants and granted a new trial to respondents as against appellants. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs, motion denied and said parts of the verdict reinstated. In our opinion the jury did not render inconsistent verdicts. On the basis of the record presented we find that the award of $100 to plaintiff Odom was not inadequate. Christ, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 537, 291 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odom-v-rosado-nyappdiv-1968.