Odom v. Ozmint

Fourth Circuit

Odom v. Ozmint

325 F. App'x 254

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 28, 2009·No. No. 08-8614·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order accepting the recom[255] mendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. Ozmint, No. 3:07-cv-00343-PMD (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order accepting the recom[255] mendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. Ozmint, No. 3:07-cv-00343-PMD (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Odom v. Ozmint, 325 F. App'x 254 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

325 F. App'x 254 (Odom v. Ozmint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related