Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Odom v. New York City Transit Authority

Odom v. New York City Transit Authority

8 A.D.3d 542, 779 N.Y.S.2d 136, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8705
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 21, 2004
StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.3d 542 (Odom v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Odom v. New York City Transit Authority, 8 A.D.3d 542, 779 N.Y.S.2d 136, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated July 10, 2003, which granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to file a late note of issue.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the precalendar order did not contain a 90-day demand pursuant to CPLR 3216. Therefore, the court could not dismiss the action based on neglect to prosecute pursuant to CPLR 3216 (see O’Connell v City Wide Auto Leasing, 6 AD3d 682 [2004]; Akpinar v John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 302 AD2d 337 [2003]; Murray v Smith Corp., 296 AD2d 445, 447 [2002]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to file a late note of issue. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Townes, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Connell v. City Wide Auto Leasing, Inc.
6 A.D.3d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Murray v. T.W. Smith Corp.
296 A.D.2d 445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Akpinar v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
302 A.D.2d 337 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.3d 542, 779 N.Y.S.2d 136, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odom-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2004.