Odom v. Microsoft
This text of Odom v. Microsoft (Odom v. Microsoft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES ODOM, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 04-35468 v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a D.C. No. CV-03-02976-MJP Washington corporation; BEST BUY ORDER CO., INC., a Minnesota corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Filed September 28, 2006
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
1 Judges Pregerson, McKeown, Wardlaw, Gould, Clifton, Smith, and Ikuta are recused.
17291 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Odom v. Microsoft, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odom-v-microsoft-ca9-2006.