Odom v. Forsythe

Fourth Circuit

Odom v. Forsythe

223 F. App'x 278

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2007·No. No. 07-6167·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Anthony L. Odom appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of the court’s prior dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. Forsythe, No. 1:06-cv-00802-TSE (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 16, 2007 & entered Jan. 18, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade[279]*279quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Anthony L. Odom appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of the court’s prior dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. Forsythe, No. 1:06-cv-00802-TSE (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 16, 2007 & entered Jan. 18, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade[279]*279quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Odom v. Forsythe, 223 F. App'x 278 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

223 F. App'x 278 (Odom v. Forsythe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related