Odom v. East Avenue Corp.
This text of 264 A.D. 985 (Odom v. East Avenue Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to dismiss the second cause of action in the complaints in four actions to recover penalties provided by statute for defendant’s refusal to serve plaintiffs in defendant’s dining room because they were negroes, and to recover damages suffered by plaintiffs because of the humiliation imposed by such refusal.) Present ■— Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ. [178 Misc. 363.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 985, 37 N.Y.S.2d 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odom-v-east-avenue-corp-nyappdiv-1942.