Odom v. East Avenue Corp.

264 A.D. 985, 37 N.Y.S.2d 491
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 264 A.D. 985 (Odom v. East Avenue Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Odom v. East Avenue Corp., 264 A.D. 985, 37 N.Y.S.2d 491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to dismiss the second cause of action in the complaints in four actions to recover penalties provided by statute for defendant’s refusal to serve plaintiffs in defendant’s dining room because they were negroes, and to recover damages suffered by plaintiffs because of the humiliation imposed by such refusal.) Present ■— Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ. [178 Misc. 363.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hobson v. York Studios, Inc.
208 Misc. 888 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 A.D. 985, 37 N.Y.S.2d 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odom-v-east-avenue-corp-nyappdiv-1942.