Odom v. East Avenue Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Odom v. East Avenue Corp.

264 A.D. 985, 37 N.Y.S.2d 491

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 1942·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to dismiss the second cause of action in the complaints in four actions to recover penalties provided by statute for defendant’s refusal to serve plaintiffs in defendant’s dining room because they were negroes, and to recover damages suffered by plaintiffs because of the humiliation imposed by such refusal.) Present ■— Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ. [178 Misc. 363.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to dismiss the second cause of action in the complaints in four actions to recover penalties provided by statute for defendant’s refusal to serve plaintiffs in defendant’s dining room because they were negroes, and to recover damages suffered by plaintiffs because of the humiliation imposed by such refusal.) Present ■— Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ. [178 Misc. 363.]

Odom v. East Avenue Corp., 264 A.D. 985, 37 N.Y.S.2d 491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

264 A.D. 985 (Odom v. East Avenue Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related