Odom v. County of Florence

189 S.E.2d 293, 258 S.C. 480, 1972 S.C. LEXIS 361
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 30, 1972
Docket19431
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 189 S.E.2d 293 (Odom v. County of Florence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Odom v. County of Florence, 189 S.E.2d 293, 258 S.C. 480, 1972 S.C. LEXIS 361 (S.C. 1972).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the lower court sustaining a demurrer to his complaint. We dismiss the appeal for failure of appellant to comply with Rule 4, Section 6 of the Rules of the Supreme Court.

No one of his so-called exceptions contains any assignment of error let alone a complete one. Examination thereof reveals that no one of them imputes any error to the lower court. They are all in the form of mere questions which, in some instances, were not presented to or passed upon by the lower court.

The object of an exception is to present some distinct principle of law which the appellant claims to have been violated by the court below; to point out some specific error complained of; and to present it in such form and manner that the point at issue may be readily recognized and properly reviewed. In the absence of any proper exception there is nothing properly before this Court for review. Cf. Brownie Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Picow, 244 S. C. 422, 137 S. E. (2d) 450; Evans v. Bruce, 245 S. C. 42, 138 S. E. (2d) 643; Winter v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 240 S. C. 561, 126 S. E. (2d) 724.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shannon v. Shannon
390 S.E.2d 380 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1990)
Hooton v. Carolina Treatment Center, Inc.
386 S.E.2d 287 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1989)
First State Savings & Loan v. Phelps
385 S.E.2d 821 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1989)
Hudson v. Hudson
363 S.E.2d 387 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1987)
Arnold v. Arnold
328 S.E.2d 924 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1985)
Southern Region Industrial Realty, Inc. v. Timmerman
328 S.E.2d 128 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1985)
Security Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Aiken v. Coleman
325 S.E.2d 546 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1985)
Bogart v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.
255 S.E.2d 449 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1979)
Larry's Wheel & Rim, Inc. v. Citizens & Southern National Bank
246 S.E.2d 860 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1978)
Kirkland v. Peoples Gas Co.
237 S.E.2d 772 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 S.E.2d 293, 258 S.C. 480, 1972 S.C. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odom-v-county-of-florence-sc-1972.