Odom v. City of Minden

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Odom v. City of Minden

256 So. 2d 639, 260 La. 597, 1972 La. LEXIS 5722

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 3, 1972

DocketNo. 52104

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 256 So. 2d 639 (Odom v. City of Minden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Odom v. City of Minden, 256 So. 2d 639, 260 La. 597, 1972 La. LEXIS 5722 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Troy S. Odom applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs denied. Applicant’s remedy is by appeal. See Bowen v. Doyal, 259 La. 839, 253 So.2d 200. Under the circumstances of this case and since the applicant relied on our prior jurisprudence, he is allowed 15 days to perfect appeal to the appropriate Court of Appeal.

McCALEB, C. J., is of the opinion that, since the time for appealing has elapsed, this Court is without authority to extend the time as provided by law.

He is also of the view that Bowen v. Doyal should be overruled insofar as it overrules prior jurisprudence.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

Bowen v. Doyal should be overruled and this Court is without authority to extend the time prescribed by the Legislature for perfecting appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI