Odom v. Attaway
This text of 157 S.E. 871 (Odom v. Attaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A motion to dismiss the writ of error was made upon the ground that certain named persons were necessary parties plaintiff in error, and that they were not parties to the bill of exceptions. A motion to amend the bill of exceptions by making those persons parties plaintiff in error was duly filed, and it appears that they have consented to this. The motion to make them parties plaintiff in error should be and is granted, and the motion to dismiss is overruled.
2. Under the facts pleaded, substantial relief was prayed against Odom, a resident of Pierce County, and the superior court of that county had jurisdiction of the case.
3. There being evidence to show that Odom was insolvent, the court was authorized under the evidence to grant the interlocutory injunction, so that at the final trial the rights of all the parties may be decided and adjudicated, including the rights of those claiming liens upon the judgment in favor of the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 S.E. 871, 172 Ga. 311, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odom-v-attaway-ga-1931.