Odmae Perron and David Albert Perron v. Cox Tank Construction
This text of Odmae Perron and David Albert Perron v. Cox Tank Construction (Odmae Perron and David Albert Perron v. Cox Tank Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-18-00477-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
ODMAE PERRON AND DAVID ALBERT PERRON, Appellants,
v.
COX TANK CONSTRUCTION, Appellee.
On appeal from the 36th District Court of Live Oak County, Texas.
ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam
Appellants’ counsel, Gregory T. Perkes, has filed an unopposed motion to
withdraw as counsel. We grant said motion. Pursuant to Rule 6.5(c) of the Texas Rules
of Appellate Procedure, counsel is directed to notify appellants, in writing, of any
previously undisclosed deadlines and file a copy of that notice with the Clerk of this Court. Appellants are directed to notify the Court promptly if they retain new counsel on
appeal by filing a notice including that attorney’s name, mailing address, email address,
telephone number, facsimile number, and State Bar of Texas identification number. See
generally TEX. R. APP. P. 6.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 5th day of March, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Odmae Perron and David Albert Perron v. Cox Tank Construction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odmae-perron-and-david-albert-perron-v-cox-tank-construction-texapp-2019.