Odlin v. City of Arcadia

Supreme Court of Florida

Odlin v. City of Arcadia

89 So. 648, 82 Fla. 178

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 9, 1921·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been sub-, mitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Taylor, Whitkield and West, J. J., concur. Browne, C. J., and Ellis, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been sub-, mitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Taylor, Whitkield and West, J. J., concur. Browne, C. J., and Ellis, J., dissent.

Odlin v. City of Arcadia, 89 So. 648, 82 Fla. 178 (Fla. 1921).

Pincite

89 So. 648 (Odlin v. City of Arcadia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.