Odighizuwa v. Strouth

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7089

PETER O. ODIGHIZUWA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER S. STROUTH,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

OFFICER J. POWERS; GARY BASS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Magistrate Judge. (7:06-cv-00720-mfu)

Submitted: December 19, 2007 Decided: January 10, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter O. Odighizuwa, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Peter O. Odighizuwa appeals the magistrate judge’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.* We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.

Odighizuwa v. Strouth, No. 7:06-cv-00720-mfu (W.D. Va. Apr. 17,

2007 & July 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The case was decided by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

- 2 -