Odewald v. Woodsum

8 N.E. 347, 142 Mass. 512, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 361
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 22, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 8 N.E. 347 (Odewald v. Woodsum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Odewald v. Woodsum, 8 N.E. 347, 142 Mass. 512, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 361 (Mass. 1886).

Opinion

Morton, C. J.

The complainant testified that the respondent got her with child in October. The respondent introduced evidence tending to show that, in October, one Lawson spent part of an evening with the complainant, under circumstances which naturally excite suspicions of improper relations between them, as bearing upon the question whether Lawson and the complainant then had sexual intercourse with each other. It was competent for the respondent to show the previous relations between them; and, for this purpose, the evidence that, in the preceding September, the complainant and Lawson had an interview under suspicious circumstances, was admissible, within the discretion of the court. Beers v. Jackman, 103 Mass. 192.

Exceptions overruled. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huntingdon v. Crowley
414 P.2d 382 (California Supreme Court, 1966)
Mensing. v. Croter
287 P. 336 (California Supreme Court, 1930)
Easdale v. Reynolds
9 N.E. 13 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 N.E. 347, 142 Mass. 512, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odewald-v-woodsum-mass-1886.