Odette Batis v. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Odette Batis v. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 106 F.4th 932
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 8, 2024·No. 23-15260·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUL 8 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ODETTE R. BATIS, on behalf of herself and No. 23-15260 all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01924-MMC Plaintiff-Appellee, Northern District of California, San Francisco v.

ORDER DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SILER,* CLIFTON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

In light of our court’s decision to vacate the opinion in Martinez v. ZoomInfo

Technologies, Inc., 82 F.4th 785 (9th Cir. 2023), the petition for panel rehearing

filed by Defendant-Appellant Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. (Dkt. 42) is

GRANTED.

The memorandum disposition filed on January 18, 2024 (Dkt. No. 38) is

WITHDRAWN. It will be replaced by an opinion to be separately filed. Petitions

for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc may be filed within fourteen days of the

filing of that opinion. See Circuit Rule 40-2.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

*

The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Odette Batis v. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc., (9th Cir. 2024).

Odette Batis v. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. (Odette Batis v. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kim Martinez v. Zoominfo Technologies, Inc.
82 F.4th 785 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)